Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Dr. Seward and Technology

Dr. Seward and Technology
Option #5
 
My blog this week is going to focus mostly on option #5, but it is difficult to discuss the character of Dr. Seward without mentioning technology, science, and Renfield (options 2 and 3). Much of Dracula is revealed from the perspective of Dr. Seward. It is through this perspective that we get a sense of the purpose of technology and science, two aspects of Victorian society that offset the presence of Dracula and the unknown.

Dr. Seward seems to represent the growing reliance upon technology and medicine in Victorian society. The simple fact that Seward’s journal is “KEPT IN PHONOGRAPH” (62), whereas the other characters physically write letters says a great deal about his role in the novel. While some characters (Renfield) keep no journal, and others communicate frequently via letters (Jonathan, Mina, Lucy), Seward keeps notes on his phonograph, which was innovative at the time as it had just been invented and few would have access to such a device. Seward’s actions reflect the use of such technology, as he tends to act and observe more logically (or factually) than the other characters -- unlike the other characters, his passion appears to consist of science and facts, rather than emotions.

Unlike the other perspectives used in Dracula, Seward’s journal entries seem to focus more on facts than emotion. This could be due to proximity to the Count, as Harker’s letters begin as being more fact-based, but soon turn towards emotion. Lucy and Mina’s correspondences focus almost primarily on their emotions. It is also through Seward that we are exposed to the frequency of Lucy’s sleepwalking and a medical perspective of Dracula‘s effects on a young Victorian woman. Seward notes that “Lucy walks more now than ever” (72) before choosing a suitor, which could be symbolizing that without the guardianship (or protection) of a man , Lucy would give into her impulses. It is also interesting to note that the only times when Seward shows emotion are concerning Lucy and her rejections of him.

Not only does Seward use the phonograph, he relies on it to validate his memories. Seward states that “I began a new record. So it will be until the Great Recorder sums me up closes my ledger account with a balance to profit or loss” (71). Instead of obsessing about sex or emotion, Seward obsesses with science and technology. He uses the phonograph to calm his fears -- in fact, it often seems that characters write (or keep record) to calm their fears. Seward does physically write when necessary to communicate (104-108), but prefers to use the telegraph. It is also because of Seward that Professor Van Helsing, another character who represents knowledge and science, is brought into the situation.

Perhaps the most interesting part of Seward’s diary is the asylum that he supervises. It is through Dr. Seward that we learn about the odd plight of Renfield, one of his patients.. Seward’s fascination with Renfield is definitely worth examining because it seems to slowly lead Seward into madness himself. Instead of the vampire causing Seward to stay up late into the night, it is his obsession with studying Renfield. It is also interesting to contrast the manner in which Seward observes Renfield with the way that Renfield interacts with his “pets” (69). I think much of Seward’s interaction with Renfield is representative of the advent of psychology. The theories of Sigmund Freud were being published and studied around the time of this novel, and although they might have been controversial at the time, they marked the beginning of psychoanalysis. Seward’s psychoanalysis of Renfield often follows Freud’s notions. Seward notes that Renfield “has certain qualities very largely developed: selfishness, secrecy, and purpose” (69). Not only are Renfield’s actions symbolic of the coming of the vampire, they offer an examination of primitive vs. civilized from the viewpoint of a doctor. As Renfield consumes his “pets” (69), Seward invents “a new classification for him, [calling] him a zoophagous (life-eating) maniac” (71). His fear of Renfield is also intriguing, as Seward notes “a strong man with homicidal and religious mania at once might be dangerous. The combination is a dreadful one” (96). The fear of the primitive is clearly noted, but it is also worth noting Seward’s trepidation with religion, especially when concerning the ways that Catholicism is used to protect the women from the vampire.

I especially find it is interesting to contrast the way that Seward appears in his own journals compared with the way that he is written about by others. Lucy remarks in a letter to Mina that Seward “is a doctor and really clever. Just fancy! He is only nine-and-twenty, and he has an immense lunatic asylum all under his own care” (56). Lucy is not attracted to him, rather, she is attracted to his position in society (although obviously not enough to marry him). In fact, Lucy suggests that Seward “would just do for [Mina]” (56), if Mina was not already engaged to Jonathan. Seward is described by Lucy as “the most resolute” (56) and “the most calm” (56) person that she has ever saw -- two traits also shown through Seward’s reliance on technology and science.

4 comments:

  1. I really enjoy how you brought technology and science into this book based on fantasy and older practices. Since I am a science major I feel I can relate to Dr. Seward more than the other characters, especially the way he goes about thinking. As you said, “It is through this (Dr. Seward’s) perspective that we get a sense of the purpose of technology and science, two aspects of Victorian society that offset the presence of Dracula and the unknown” (Mcmahont). I agree with you that he definitely feels different than the other characters. He is much more logical than the other characters and rarely reacts with an emotional response.
    I’m glad you said that idea about Lucy sleep walking more symbolizes that she needs a man in her life as a guardian; because I think that Dr. Seward feels that way and he thinks that she needs him as a protector. This is really the only time he ever thinks emotionally, whenever he is dealing with rejection from Lucy.
    Dr. Seward is an essential character in this story because he is the reason that Van Helsing gets brought into the picture. It is through Dr. Seward that the story is able to progress into the later stages of chasing the Count and eventually vanquishing him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also found Dr. Seward to be one of the more logical characters of the book. He seemed to be slightly less prone to superstitions and things like that. Also, I found that his study of Renfield was very interesting. Like you said, it wasn't the vampire that consumed him, but his own obsession. I think Seward's study of Renfield, as well as his observations about the hospital, fit well into the book because of how, at it's core, Dracula deals with mostly psychological horror, rather than physical.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting to think about Dr. Seward as one of the more "logical" characters in the book, especially when we consider the extent to which his devotion to science and technology is confronted by incredible supernatural forces. I like how Tom brings up psychoanalysis in his post, saying, "I think much of Seward’s interaction with Renfield is representative of the advent of psychology. The theories of Sigmund Freud were being published and studied around the time of this novel, and although they might have been controversial at the time, they marked the beginning of psychoanalysis." What is interesting to me is that Dr. Seward is apart of a "science" that is just as mysterious as, well, "vampirism" or any other aspect of the supernatural. On page 71, Seward ponders opening up Renfield's brain, saying, "Men sneered at vivisection, and yet look at its results today! Why not advance science in its most difficult and vital aspect--the knowledge of the brain?" Similar to how knowledge of the occult and the vampire produces its own discourse in this novel, we see the emerging discourse of psychoanalysis through the character of Dr. Seward. Seen here in its infancy, the discourse of psychoanalysis seems fueled less by hard science, but by superstition, assumption, and blind experimentation.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it is interesting that Dr. Seward is considered the rational one yet it is neither science nor rationality that can save people from vampires. It is the superstitions of the uneducated.

    ReplyDelete